Conservative is in reference to what the founders of our nation gave to us so we may live in a land that is free and not a police state that the muslem nigger president now in the black house has in store for you. Don’t worry, in a few months you will be much too busy trying to survive in the new totalitarian america to even think about what conservative freedom really means.

regard

Although I haven’t heard from OS on that site on the “another take on long hair” thread, I just posted in concern of this wierdo, who goes by “Juan Rico”, that OS had allegedly “imported in order to pick our cotton and get him off of alcohol”. As I read the comment, it sounds like another stupid troll, which OS doesn’t allow on his site–or does he?

Well, yes. Anyways, I am not so sure if the man is exactly “nuts”, I’m more convinced that the man is both evil and intellectually dishonest. Which, in other words, mean he is… nuts.

I’m not going to spend much more time over there. I’m not a calvinist, nor am I any other denomination of medieval christianity like OS is, so he and I are not, in any way, the same.

Thanks for letting me post on your blog, although I am sorry to go off topic in the port a potty thread; I apologize, but I don’t know where I can do general discussion. If there is, and I missed it by any chance, please let me know where it is, so that we can discuss on matters further.

thank you,

That is all,
God bless.

Why would the woman go into a port-a-potty to give birth? And why would she just leave her baby in there when she herself must look after her own child instead of leaving her child in that nasty, filthy place?

Dispite that I have no involvement in this matter whatsoever, it just boggles my mind.

Now the blue part is a bit off topic, if it’s not allowed, then please forgive me:

Hey, CPD.
I haven’t seen you on C4C for a while. Don’t be offended if I ask, but did you get banned again?

The reason why I am going off-topic here(please forgive me) is that I want to thank you for helping me out me and Joe in the last thread in C4C, when we were clearing up some of the things that Bob Corker was talking about. He did make some reply with some old mesopotamian artwork, when we found out that there is no mention of his claim in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

So far, after giving him the futher analysis on 1 Corinthians 11:14 with the rest of the Bible and then listening to him address that analysis along with addressing our further questions, me and Joe had found many errors in his argument. The inconsistency of that man’s answers, seems enough to convince me that the man is lying. Asking question after question, the man is making less and less sense about his haughty, hateful claim that long haired men are evil. Claiming that long haired men are evil, because he wants to justify his virulent hate against the long haired man.

No christian that I know of has this kind of hate in his heart. I have never seen a man get a Bible and not follow it, but much rather instead, use it as a weapon–a weapon, to justify his hate and wrath.

This man uses claims in the bible so often, takes them out of context to better suit his agenda. If it wasn’t for you, I wouldn’t have seen it, however, when I saw him post another hateful thread against long haired men, I just began to get a bigger picture of what was going on, but you have given me the last piece to the puzzle.

Although there are some things that he an I agree on, I don’t think that he is somebody that I should be fooling with anymore. I have wasted so much time trying to help this blind man see, but it’s possible that he is not really blind, but evil.

It is known that Satan is the father of lies. I have seen so much dishonesty in this man’s posting when he talks about things. He twists the bible to justify himself when he is wrong, even though we know that he’s obiously wrong with the bible.

He accuses people of wrongdoings things that he himself is guily of.

Have you seen the video that he posts up in that ‘Another take on long hair’? There is a full video of the “poor man’s” sermon, called “Young Baptist Preaches Against Hippie, Queer, Idolatrous “Jesus” – Championship Edition”. shows exactly what was going on at the certain time. However, he keeps leaving stuff out to make it look to the average person that he is right. He takes things out of it’s original context and then puts it into his own.

Besides my hartford buddy, Joe, you were the only other guy in there who made sense. And since there is no other way that I can contact you, I have to post here.

Although, being a Conservative Christian, my understading of the real world and politics, comes from common sense first. I tend to be neutral when it comes from the bible, so that I do not get lost in predetermined theology like Corker has. I study and leave no stone unturned.

Anyways, what I wanted to do was thank you for helping us see what was going on over there.

I apologize for being off topic, but however, after seeing that there has been no posts on this thread, I just thought that at least giving it some thought would be decent. If what I did was not appropriate on this blog, then I do apologize.

Anyways, thank you for illuminating our path to what Corker was really like. That man, continuing to be intellectually dishonest on his claim, does not change. It seems that the poor man is possibly an irredeemable soul.

That is all,
God bless